The integration of biomethane into the natural gas infrastructure is a critical element of energy-sector decarbonization, yet optimal infrastructure development scenarios remain insufficiently compared using unified decision frameworks. This study evaluates three biomethane market integration scenarios—direct connection to the gas system, biomethane injection points (compressed biomethane transported by trucks to the gas system), and off-grid delivery using the multi-criteria decision-making method TOPSIS. Environmental, economic, and technical dimensions are jointly assessed. Results indicate that direct connection to the system provides the most balanced overall performance, achieving the highest integrated score (Ci = 0.70), driven by superior environmental and technical characteristics. Biomethane injection points demonstrate strong economic advantages (Ci = 0.49), particularly where capital investments need to be reduced or there is limited access to the gas system, but show weaker environmental and technical performance. Off-grid solutions perform poorly in integrated assessment (Ci = 0.00), reflecting limited scalability and high logistical complexity, although niche applications may remain viable under specific conditions. Sensitivity analysis confirms the robustness of these rankings across a wide range of weighting assumptions, strengthening the reliability of the findings for policy and infrastructure planning. This study provides one of the first integrated multi-criteria assessments explicitly incorporating virtual pipeline logistics, offering a transferable decision-support framework for sustainable biomethane development in diverse regional contexts.
Ansone et al. (Wed,) studied this question.