In this work, we consider "decision" variants of a well-known monogamy-of-entanglement game by Tomamichel, Fehr, Kaniewski, and Wehner New Journal of Physics '13. In its original "search" variant, Alice prepares a (possibly entangled) state on registers ABC; register 𝖠, consisting of n qubits, is sent to a Referee, while 𝖡 and 𝖢 are sent to Bob and Charlie; the Referee then measures each qubit in the standard or Hadamard basis (chosen uniformly at random). The basis choices are sent to Bob and Charlie, whose goal is to simultaneously guess the Referee’s n-bit measurement outcome string x. Tomamichel et al. show that the optimal winning probability is cos^2n (π/8), following a perfect parallel repetition theorem. We consider the following "decision" variants of this game: - Variant 1, "XOR repetition": Bob and Charlie’s goal is to guess the XOR of all the bits of x. Ananth et al. Asiacrypt '24 conjectured that the optimal advantage over random guessing decays exponentially in n. Surprisingly, we show that this conjecture is false, and, in fact, there is no decay at all: there exists a strategy that wins with probability cos² (π/8) ≈ 0. 85 for any n. Moreover, this strategy does not involve any entanglement between Alice, Bob, and Charlie! - Variant 2, "Goldreich-Levin": The Referee additionally samples a uniformly random n-bit string r that is sent to Bob and Charlie along with the basis choices. Their goal is to guess the parity of r⋅ x. We show that the optimal advantage over random guessing decays exponentially in n for the restricted class of adversaries that do not share entanglement. A similar result was already shown by Champion et al. and Çakan et al. ; we give a more direct proof. Showing that Variant 2 is "secure" (i. e. , that the optimal winning probability is exponentially close to 1/2) against general adversaries would imply the existence of an information-theoretically "unclonable bit". We put forward a reasonably concrete conjecture that is equivalent to the general security of Variant 2.
Coladangelo et al. (Thu,) studied this question.