This policy brief provides a comprehensive framework for improving international engagement with Sudan, focusing on key strategies to address the current political challenges. The analysis highlights the complexities arising from Sudan’s political alliances, particularly the role of the Tagadom coalition and the Democratic Bloc (DB), and how these dynamics impact the broader political landscape. The brief underscores the limitations of relying solely on the Tagadom coalition, which, despite its neutrality, has not fully represented the diverse interests of the Sudanese populace. The shifting support of the DB towards the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) further complicates the political process, introducing additional layers of division and conflict. The international community’s current approach, which emphasizes a ceasefire, has inadvertently reinforced existing divisions. To achieve a sustainable transition, this brief advocates for a more balanced approach that includes power-sharing arrangements and trust-building measures. Recommendations include expanding engagement beyond the Tagadom coalition, promoting equitable power-sharing, and facilitating dialogue among all relevant parties.
Hamad et al. (Mon,) studied this question.