Prosthesis–patient mismatch occurred in 29.5% of TAVI patients and was linked to increased heart failure admissions (OR 1.52) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.43).
Does prosthesis-patient mismatch after TAVI increase the risk of adverse clinical events and worse echocardiographic parameters in patients with aortic stenosis?
Prosthesis-patient mismatch after TAVI occurs in nearly 30% of patients and is significantly associated with worse echocardiographic function, increased heart failure hospitalizations, and higher all-cause mortality.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
Abstract Introduction and Objectives There is ongoing debate regarding the potential clinical implications of prosthesis–patient mismatch (PPM) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Our aim was to assess the prevalence of PPM in patients undergoing TAVI and its association with post-procedure clinical outcomes, as well as to identify predictors related to the development of PPM. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospective single-center cohort of patients treated with TAVI between 2008 and 2023. Regression models were used to identify significant predictors of outcomes. PPM was defined as an indexed effective orifice area (EOA) ≤0.85 cm²/m² (severe if ≤0.65 cm²/m²) and ≤0.70 cm²/m² (severe if ≤0.55 cm²/m²) in patients with a BMI ≥30 kg/m². The EOA was calculated using the continuity equation. Results Out of a total of 1,325 post-TAVI patients, 392 (29.5%) presented with PPM, of whom 274 (20.7%) had moderate PPM and 118 (8.9%) had severe PPM. Variables significantly associated with the presence of PPM included arterial hypertension, atrial fibrillation, body surface area, and EuroSCORE II. Regarding echocardiographic characteristics, patients with better left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) function at baseline showed a lower incidence of PPM (see Table). On follow-up echocardiograms, patients with PPM had higher aortic mean gradients (11.7 vs 8.8 mmHg; p0.001), smaller estimated valve areas (1.22 vs 2.29 cm²; p0.001), lower LV ejection fraction (58.2% vs 60.6%; p0.001), reduced LV strain (-14.9% vs -16.3%; p0.001), more impaired LA strain (16.2% vs 17.8%; p=0.013), and greater indexed LV mass (119 vs 113 g/m²; p=0.039), with no significant differences in right ventricular function. The presence of PPM was associated with an increased risk of heart failure-related hospital admissions during follow-up (OR: 1.52; 95% CI: 1.12–2.04; p=0.005), and all-cause mortality (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.12–1.83; p=0.004) (see Figure). Conclusions In our cohort of patients with aortic stenosis treated with TAVI, the presence of PPM—identified in approximately one-third of the sample—was significantly associated with worse LV and LA function and a higher incidence of adverse clinical events during follow-up. Systematic identification and individualized management of these patients could help improve their prognosis.
Zapata et al. (Thu,) reported a other. Prosthesis–patient mismatch occurred in 29.5% of TAVI patients and was linked to increased heart failure admissions (OR 1.52) and all-cause mortality (OR 1.43).