The process of designing national policy is complicated and impacted by both political and rational analysis. The conflict between politics and reason in policymaking is examined in this essay, with an emphasis on how these forces influence choices, priorities, and results. This study uses a comparative case study technique to investigate cases where political variables compromised or influenced the rational design of policies, drawing on theoretical frameworks from behavioural economics, political science, and public policy. The results provide light on the inherent trade-offs between political expediency and evidence-based decision-making, guiding academics, decision-makers, and practitioners attempting to overcome these obstacles.
Shah Mohammad Omer Faruqe Jubaer (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: