Background/Objectives: The variable accuracy of middle ear disease diagnosis based on oto-endoscopy underscores the need for improved decision support. Although convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) are currently a mainstay of computer-aided diagnosis (CAD), their constraints in global feature integration persist. We therefore systematically benchmarked state-of-the-art CNNs and Transformers to establish a performance baseline. Beyond this benchmark, our primary contribution is the development of a probability-guided Top-K clinical decision framework that balances high accuracy with complete case coverage for practical deployment. Methods: Using a multicenter dataset of 6361 images (five categories), we implemented a two-stage validation strategy (fixed-split followed by 5-fold cross-validation). A comprehensive comparison was performed among leading CNNs and Transformer variants assessed by accuracy and Macro-F1 score. Results: The Swin Transformer model demonstrated superior performance, achieving an accuracy of 95.53% and a Macro-F1 score of 93.37%. It exhibited exceptional stability (95.61% ± 0.38% in cross-validation) and inherent robustness to class imbalance. A probability-guided Top-2 decision framework was developed, achieving 93.25% accuracy with 100% case coverage. Conclusions: This rigorous benchmark established Swin Transformer as the most effective architecture. Consequently, this study delivers not only a performance benchmark but also a clinically actionable decision-support framework, thereby facilitating the deployment of AI-assisted diagnosis for chronic middle ear conditions in specialist otology.
Chen et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: