Multicenter imaging studies are increasingly critical in epidemiology, yet variability across scanners, acquisition protocols, and reconstruction algorithms introduces systematic biases that threaten reproducibility and comparability of quantitative biomarkers. This paper reviews the major sources of heterogeneity in MRI, CT, and PET-CT data, highlighting their impact on epidemiologic inference, including misclassification, reduced statistical power, and compromised generalizability. We outline harmonization strategies spanning pre-acquisition standardization, phantom-based calibration, post-acquisition intensity normalization, and advanced statistical and machine learning methods such as ComBat and domain adaptation. Illustrative examples from MRI flow quantification and radiomic feature extraction demonstrate how harmonization can mitigate site effects and enable robust large-scale analyses.
Zholshybek et al. (Tue,) studied this question.