Background: Alcohol withdrawal syndrome is a common clinical challenge that may lead to significant complications if not properly managed. Symptom-triggered therapy (STT) represents a promising alternative to fixed-dose regimens (FDRs) providing benzodiazepine prescriptions based on objectively quantified withdrawal symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of STT using the Hamburg Alcohol Withdrawal Scale (HAES) compared to FDRs in the management of inpatient alcohol detoxification. Methods: In a retrospective case–control study, alcohol detoxification treatment in STT was compared with FDRs. During a twelve-month observation period, a total of 123 patients in the STT group were recruited and compared with 123 controls in the FDR group (matched according to sex, age, and current amount of alcohol consumption) treated in the same hospital before the implementation of STT. The study outcomes included the total benzodiazepine dosage, duration of acute detoxification phase, length of inpatient stay, and occurrence of complications such as epileptic seizures and delirium tremens. Results: STT showed a significantly lower total benzodiazepine dosage (22.50 mg vs. 115.00 mg, p < 0.001), a shorter duration of the detoxification phase (48.00 h vs. 201.75 h, p < 0.001), and a reduced length of inpatient stay (23.00 days vs. 28.00 days, p = 0.003) compared to FDRs. There were no significant differences in the rates of complications between the two settings. Linear mixed model analysis revealed that the differences remained highly significant even after adjusting for various explanatory variables (i.e., age, sex, standard units of alcohol, psychiatric comorbidities, treatment discontinuation, and occurrence of any complication). Conclusions: STT appears to be as effective and safe as traditional fixed-dose regimens of benzodiazepines for the management of inpatient alcohol detoxification. This approach may thereby minimize unnecessary pharmacological exposure, facilitate the earlier integration of patients into psychoeducational and psychosocial interventions, and reduce healthcare costs.
Becciolini et al. (Thu,) studied this question.