New luminescent coatings are increasingly being used in highway tunnels to address inadequate internal lighting conditions. However, there is currently a lack of scientifically reliable methods to evaluate the effectiveness of these paints in improving lighting conditions, reducing driver psychological stress, and quantifying these impacts. This study utilized new luminescent coatings to improve tunnel lighting conditions, conducting real-vehicle tests to measure drivers’ physiological parameters including pupil diameter and heart rate. It examined the mechanisms through which variations in lighting conditions within highway tunnels affect the psychological workload of drivers. A hierarchical analysis–fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (AHP-FCE) method was adopted to develop a quantitative evaluation system for highway tunnel driving psychological load. The results indicate that variations in tunnel lighting substantially influence the psychological workload experienced by drivers during operation. The new luminescent coatings effectively enhanced tunnel lighting conditions, increasing average brightness and illuminance by 37.71% and 40.95%, respectively. Following lighting improvements, pupil diameter variation rates during tunnel entry and exit phases decreased by 35.37% and 10.06%, respectively, while heart rate variation rates decreased by 12.50% and 4.36%. Quantitative analysis of driver mental load revealed a comprehensive score of 0.6230 before lighting enhancement, which decreased to 0.2702 after improvements. This research introduces an innovative integrative framework that combines physiological parameter monitoring with the AHP-FCE method to quantitatively assess the psychological workload experienced by drivers in tunnel environments. This approach addresses a significant gap in the literature concerning the quantitative relationship between tunnel lighting optimization and drivers’ psychological workload responses.
Zhu et al. (Wed,) studied this question.