Corporate financial distress typically emerges through a gradual accumulation process, rendering crisis prediction inherently dynamic and path-dependent. However, many existing studies continue to rely on static cross-sectional data or short-term observations, which limits their ability to capture the temporal evolution of financial risk. To address this issue, this study develops a time-series financial crisis early warning framework based on Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and systematically evaluates the incremental value of temporal information in corporate distress prediction. Using annual data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2019 to 2023, we construct both single-year cross-sectional datasets and a five-year multi-period time-series dataset under a unified experimental protocol. Within this dual-framework setting, RNNs are compared with Random Forest (RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) using identical feature sets, training–testing splits, and evaluation criteria. Model performance is assessed through multiple metrics, including Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1 score, and AUC, complemented by statistical validation using McNemar tests, loss-based comparisons, and bootstrap confidence intervals. The empirical results show that while RF and BPNN exhibit strong robustness in static, single-period prediction tasks, RNNs achieve consistently superior performance when multi-period temporal information is explicitly modeled. Statistical tests indicate that the observed performance advantages of RNNs are systematic and stable, though moderate under the current sample size. This study provides empirical evidence that incorporating temporal structures into financial crisis prediction can substantially enhance predictive effectiveness under constrained labeled data. The findings highlight the importance of time-series modeling for early warning applications and offer practical guidance for selecting appropriate predictive frameworks across different data structures.
Duan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: