Abstract President Carter's handling of the Iran Hostage Crisis was an archetypal example of the influence of presidential personality and domestic factors on force preference decision-making. Carter's worldview allegedly led him to prioritize hostage safety and shun the use of force. However, this article presents a revisionist account of the crisis based on newly declassified documents that demonstrates that international factors, including the invasion of Afghanistan, the regional balance of power, and American credibility were determinative. Contrary to his reputation as a weak leader, Carter actively sought a military solution to the conflict, but his ability to act was constrained by the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Following the invasion, Carter's focus shifted from using force against Iran to deterring a Soviet invasion of the country. The article alters the current understanding of the crisis and challenges the dominance of personality and domestic factors in the use of force decision-making literature.
Cindy May (Sat,) studied this question.