Obesity is recognized as a causal risk factor for the development of multiple cancers, with risk magnitude varying by tumor site, sex, life stage, and adipose tissue distribution. This narrative review synthesizes recent epidemiological evidence linking excess body fatness with cancer incidence and mortality and integrates the biological mechanisms that explain this association. Chronic low-grade inflammation, insulin resistance with compensatory hyperinsulinemia, dysregulation of adipose-derived hormones and sex steroids, impairment of anti-tumor immune responses, alterations in the gut microbiota, and remodeling of the tumor microenvironment collectively create conditions that favor tumor initiation and progression. Bariatric surgery is the most effective clinical intervention for achieving substantial and sustained weight loss in individuals with severe obesity, and growing evidence indicates that it is associated with a reduction in overall cancer risk and cancer-related mortality, particularly for malignancies strongly linked to obesity. However, the extent of this benefit differs by surgical technique and remains less consistent for colorectal cancer. Beyond metabolic improvements, bariatric surgery produces long-term changes in nutritional physiology that may also influence oncologic outcomes. Persistent deficiencies of micronutrients such as iron, folate, vitamin B12, vitamin D, and calcium can affect DNA synthesis, methylation, oxidative balance, and cellular repair. Altered protein and energy intake may contribute to loss of lean mass and reduced metabolic resilience, while changes in alcohol absorption and metabolism can increase systemic exposure to ethanol and its carcinogenic metabolites. In addition, bariatric surgery induces sustained remodeling of the gut microbiome and bile acid metabolism, which may further modulate tumorigenic signaling. Overall, the oncological impact of bariatric surgery reflects a balance between metabolic improvement and long-term nutritional management, underscoring the need for structured follow-up and targeted nutritional strategies to optimize cancer risk reduction.
Reytor-González et al. (Fri,) studied this question.