This thesis explores the evolving landscape and shifting comfort zones of Swiss non-governmental organizations (NGOs), with a particular focus on the challenges they face today. In a country known for its strong civil society and vibrant nonprofit sector, this thesis aims to address a timely and under-researched question: What are the key challenges currently perceived by directors, founders, and workers of Swiss non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in the contemporary Swiss context? Using a mixed-methods approach, the research combines a comprehensive literature review with qualitative interviews conducted with Swiss NGO actors, including HEKS, AsyLex, Solidar Suisse, and foundations managed by Monica Guelmani. In addition to challenges, the study investigates the meaning of civil society, the motivations behind NGO creation, and the unique advantages and opportunities of operating in Switzerland. Findings reveal that despite Switzerland's favorable legal and philanthropic environment, NGOs face significant internal and external pressures. Legal rigidity, especially within foundations, restricts the use of funds due to inflexible statutory purposes. Supervisory authorities offer little flexibility, preventing organizations from adapting to shifting societal needs. Sector-wide coordination also remains weak: unlike in the U.S., where umbrella associations strengthen advocacy and resilience, Swiss NGOs lack unified representation, a gap directly highlighted by interviewees. Financial and resource constraints further complicate operations. NGOs are increasingly reliant on private donors, yet face administrative burdens, complex tax exemption processes, and mounting pressure to reduce overhead, even when such costs are essential for effective work. Public trust, once a pillar of NGO legitimacy, appears fragile, threatened by growing skepticism and media scrutiny. Despite these challenges, the thesis highlights the resilience and continued relevance of Swiss NGOs. They remain critical in upholding democratic values, addressing unmet social needs, and filling institutional gaps. However, to remain impactful, the sector must become more flexible and better coordinated. This study offers fresh insight into a sector at a crossroads, where comfort zones are shifting, expectations are rising, and the need for reform is clear. It serves as both a reflection and a call to action for policymakers, practitioners, and researchers invested in the future of civil society in Switzerland.
Jelena Kovacevic (Wed,) studied this question.