The field of mental-health care continues to face the challenge of translating conceptual approaches into the idiographic reality of everyday clinical practice. For any framework to be both meaningful and useful to individual cases, it must account for the contextual, interconnected, temporal, and granular nature of such problems and prioritize clinical utility by design. In this narrative review, we aim to bridge this gap by proposing a workable framework building on these premises. Our proposal centers on the concept of “problem-sustaining patterns,” which aligns with the ongoing trend toward complexity thinking while offering sufficient clinical utility in practice. We advocate for a collaborative approach in which professionals and help-seeking individuals co-construct these models. Furthermore, we discuss the need for new digital tools to facilitate the procedural steps while also enabling development of generative models as clinical decision-making support tools, which could significantly enhance the feasibility of embracing complexity in clinical practice.
Driessen et al. (Fri,) studied this question.