Sustainable urban water system (UWS) management is vital for climate-resilient, resource-efficient cities. This study presents the first comprehensive life cycle assessment (LCA) of Seoul Metropolitan City (SMC)’s UWS, encompassing water abstraction, treatment, distribution, wastewater collection and treatment, and sludge management. Nine midpoint impact categories from ReCiPe 2016 (H) were analyzed to identify environmental hotspots and mitigation pathways. Results show that wastewater treatment dominates impacts, contributing 57.3% of global warming potential (GWP; 0.947 kg CO2-eq per functional unit of 1 m3 of potable water supplied) and 71.1% of freshwater eutrophication (FE; 0.00066 kg P-eq/m3), driven by electricity use, sludge disposal, and direct CH4/N2O emissions. Electricity consumption is the leading driver across GWP, terrestrial acidification (TA), and fossil resource scarcity (FRS). Infrastructure construction notably influenced terrestrial ecotoxicity (TET) and human toxicity. Sensitivity analysis showed that SMC’s projected 2030 electricity mix could reduce GWP and FRS by up to 18%. Scenario evaluations revealed that sludge ash utilization in concrete and expanded wastewater reuse improve resource circularity, whereas biogas upgrading, solar generation, and heat recovery significantly lower GWP and FRS. The findings underscore the importance of energy decarbonization, resource recovery, and infrastructure longevity in achieving low-carbon and resource-efficient UWSs. This study offers a transferable framework for guiding sustainability transitions in rapidly urbanizing, energy-transitioning regions.
Li et al. (Wed,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: