Dosimetric comparison between manual and inverse optimization methods in high-dose-rate intracavitary/interstitial cervical cancer brachytherapy for two treatment planning systems
Key Points
Higher target coverage is achieved using inverse planning methods, enhancing treatment effectiveness.
RSB outperforms HIPO in delivering doses and ensuring better dose homogeneity.
Analysis of dose distribution confirms that both methods can produce acceptable treatment plans.
Brachytherapy for cervical cancer shows promise, but further validation across diverse settings may be necessary.
Abstract
Both inverse planning methods are able to produce dosimetrically acceptable plans, with an increase of target coverage and better homogeneity. RSB provides higher doses and better homogeneity than HIPO.
Dosimetric comparison between manual and inverse optimization methods in high-dose-rate intracavitary/interstitial cervical cancer brachytherapy for two treatment planning systems | Synapse