Accueil
Explorer
nav.journalClub
Tendances
Plus
synapse
⌘+K
Langue
Français
Français
Applying the Argument-Based Approach to Validation With Clinical Outcome Assessments: Strategies for Constructing a Rationale | Synapse
March 3, 2026
Applying the Argument-Based Approach to Validation With Clinical Outcome Assessments: Strategies for Constructing a Rationale
KW
Kevin P. Weinfurt
RW
R.J. Wirth
Vector (United States)
ME
Michael C. Edwards
See all
Key Points
Validation of clinical outcome assessments is crucial for effective healthcare evaluation, ensuring accurate results.
The argument-based approach enables a structured rationale formation, enhancing credibility and acceptance in clinical settings.
Assessment involves a systematic framework to evaluate the performance, utility, and relevance of clinical outcome assessments.
The findings may inform better validation practices, thereby improving patient outcomes in healthcare.
Mark Helpful
Like
Save
Bookmark
Relay
Share
Mark Helpful
Like
Save
Bookmark
Relay
Share
Cite This Study
Copy
Weinfurt et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69a76683badf0bb9e87dd486
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2026.01.007