Background: Anti-double-stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) antibodies are a key serological marker for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and are commonly assessed in conjunction with anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) testing by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on HEp-2 cells. However, their detection is influenced both by the heterogeneity of the autoimmune response and by the characteristics of the analytical method employed, thereby complicating diagnostic interpretation. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, 3090 consecutive patients undergoing anti-dsDNA analysis were screened, and 138 positive individuals, with anti-dsDNA levels ≥ 15 IU/mL by fluoroenzyme immunoassay (FEIA), were included in the study. A control group of 29 anti-dsDNA-negative patients was also analyzed. Anti-dsDNA-positive patients were stratified by antibody level (low, mild, high), and the results were correlated with HEp-2 IIF titers and fluorescence patterns. Furthermore, in a subset of 30 positive patients, anti-dsDNA antibodies were evaluated using immunoblotting (IB) and the Crithidia luciliae indirect immunofluorescence test (CLIFT). Statistical analyses assessed associations and concordance among methods. Results: Higher anti-dsDNA levels were generally associated with higher HEp-2 IIF titers. However, a considerable percentage (35%) of patients with positive anti-dsDNA were negative by HEp-2 IIF. Notably, high anti-dsDNA levels were detected in 19% of HEp-2 IIF-negative patients (titer 1:320). In the subset of 30 positive patients, FEIA analysis showed high concordance with the immunoblot in both IIF-positive (81%) and -negative (100%) patients, while CLIFT demonstrated lower agreement with both FEIA and IB independently of the IIF. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that anti-dsDNA antibody detection may occur independently of HEp-2 IIF positivity and that FEIA, especially when confirmed by immunoblot, represents a reliable approach for anti-dsDNA assessment. The observed results in this study likely reflect differences in epitope recognition and assay sensitivity among methods, suggesting the use of a multi-step diagnostic strategy in the serological evaluation of SLE.
Papale et al. (Thu,) studied this question.