The familiar phrase “struggle for survival” usually assumes that beings already exist as sufficiently formed units and then enter conflict in order to preserve themselves. This paper argues that such a picture is metaphysically incomplete. Drawing on Metaphysics of the Absolute and Reference Points (MARP), it contends that struggle is often better understood as a process of ontological fixation rather than a secondary response to external threat. Under determinate conditions, beings do not struggle only to remain what they already are; they struggle because existence at the level of attribution must be stabilized, resumed, and carried within a limited field of reference, differentiation, and constraint. Conflict, on this view, is not fundamentally a clash among ready-made substances. It arises where differentiated manifestations press toward incompatible stabilizations within the same constrained field. The paper further argues that the truth at stake in struggle is not always a detached object wholly external to the strugglers, but may function as a constrained mode of manifested existence: a legitimate stabilization of readable difference within a limited economy of measurement. The argument is strictly philosophical and non-justificatory. To explain struggle as a structural consequence of ontological differentiation is not to endorse violence, domination, or oppression.
Laurent Theophile D'Artagnan (Fri,) studied this question.