The non-compete covenant, in conjunction with the duty to safeguard trade secrets, constitutes a carefully delineated exception to the constitutional and legal principle of freedom of work. Its enforceability is justified solely where necessity demands the protection of the employer’s legitimate interests, provided that the employee, by virtue of their position, has gained access to material information of substantial economic value. The Iraqi legislature has addressed this covenant with notable precision under Articles (909/e, 910, 911) of the Civil Code and Article (42/Second/C) of the Labor Law, conditioning its validity upon essential requirements: attainment of legal capacity by the employee, and limitations reasonably circumscribed in terms of duration, geographic scope, and type of activity. These conditions are designed to prevent the clause from degenerating into an instrument of exploitation or a restriction that imperils the employee’s economic future. This approach is further reinforced by reference to international standards, most prominently the TRIPS Agreement, which predicates the protection of trade secrets upon confidentiality, commercial value, and reasonable measures of preservation.This study elucidates the pivotal role of the non-compete covenant in striking a delicate equilibrium between two competing interests: the preservation of the employer’s intangible assets—comprising trade secrets and proprietary economic interests—and the protection of the employee’s constitutionally guaranteed right to work and earn a livelihood. To that end, the legislature permits the employee to liberate themselves from the restriction by paying the stipulated penalty,
Ahmed Naji NAYEF (Sun,) studied this question.