Introduction: Psychological distress in cancer is common and linked to poorer adherence, higher utilization, and worse outcomes, making mental health integration a core component of effective oncology care. Methods: We completed a PRISMA-ScR/JBI-guided scoping review (OSF preregistered) of peer-reviewed studies (2011–2025; English/Scandinavian) searched in PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science. PCC eligibility included adults with cancer/survivors, caregivers, and oncology professionals; data were synthesized using inductive thematic synthesis supported by Covidence and NVivo. Results: Twenty-eight studies were included. Five themes emerged: persistent distress across survivorship; structural, cultural and attitudinal barriers to service use; impacts on guideline-concordant care, adherence, utilization and survival; caregiver burden; and digital/innovative interventions. Discussion: Integrated models should embed routine screening, clinician-initiated pathways, culturally tailored supports, and hybrid digital services, alongside sustainable implementation outputs to reduce inequities and improve outcomes in practice.
Jørgensen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: