This research evaluated the efficacy of digital psychological interventions aimed at bolstering mental health and social well-being among vulnerable population groups. The study involved 200 participants, of whom 187 completed all stages of the investigation. Data were collected using the Scale of Adjustment and Way of Life by Rogers and Dymond, Ryff's Psychological Well-Being Scales, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21, and the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Analytical methods included descriptive statistics, group comparisons prior to the intervention (t-tests/Mann-Whitney), two-way ANOVA with repeated measures, and thematic analysis of qualitative data. Scale reliability was confirmed through Cronbach's alpha analysis. The experimental group experienced a significant upward trend in social and psychological well-being (from 22.1 to 26.8 points) and a simultaneous decrease in negative emotional states (DASS-21 scores dropped from 13.9 to 9.7 points). Marked improvements were also recorded in social-psychological adaptation. Specifically, constructive emotion regulation (CERQ) increased from 13.9 to 17.4 points within the experimental group, while the control group showed no measurable changes across any parameters. The results underscore the substantial capacity of digital solutions to improve access to psychological support and social resources while reducing structural and individual barriers to their use. The findings further indicate that digital interventions can effectively support well-being, facilitate adaptive processes, and promote constructive emotional regulation among vulnerable populations. Future research should be directed towards evaluating the long-term effects of the intervention and customizing programs to accommodate diverse socio-cultural contexts.
Zozuliak-Sluchyk et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: