ObjectivesFDG PET/MRI is a promising imaging modality for nodal staging in rectal cancer; however, its role remains to be defined.We aimed to assess its performance in detecting mesorectal malignant lymph node involvement based on both metabolic and morphological criteria at PET/MRI versus at MRI alone. Materials 39 men) were examined with FDG PET/MRI followed by individual anatomical matching of mesorectal nodal structures between histopathology and MRI.PET N-stage assessment was evaluated using FDG uptake over background levels, MRI N-stage by the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus criteria and PET/MRI was evaluated using both in combination.Histopathological assessment served as gold standard, and the accuracy of identifying malignancy at both nodal and patient level was calculated.Furthermore, FDG PET/MRI and MRI using ESGAR criteria for nodal restaging after neoadjuvant treatment were also evaluated. ResultsIn total, 835 nodal structures were matched, of which 104 were malignant (12%); among these, 59/104 (57%) were histopathologically proven lymph node metastases.MRI alone yielded a sensitivity of 54% and specificity of 85% for nodal malignancy, while the corresponding estimates for FDG-avidity gave a 75% sensitivity and 79% specificity.The different combined FDG PET/MRI criteria for malignancy were evaluated: FDG-positivity or malignancy according to ESGAR criteria resulted in a sensitivity of 76%; while the combination of FDG-positivity and malignancy according to ESGAR criteria achieved a specificity of 90%. ConclusionCompared to MRI alone, FDG PET/MRI offers potential added value by reducing the risk of nodal understaging. Highlights FDG PET/MRI may improve nodal staging in rectal cancer beyond MRI alone Patients underwent PET/MRI with node matching between imaging and histopathology
Rutegård et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: