We present the first quantitative analysis of stylistic convergence in Japanese technical blog writing across six LLMs (Claude Sonnet 4, GPT-4o, Qwen 3.5-4B/9B, Swallow-20B, Llama 3.2-1B) using 180 samples measured with 16 linguistic pattern indicators. Key findings: (1) RLHF-aligned commercial models score significantly higher than open-source alternatives (Cohen's d = 1.01); (2) vocabulary-level and structural indicators dissociate (the "Swallow Paradox"); (3) human Qiita articles score higher than AI on structural metrics, revealing cultural confounding. All data, code, and analysis scripts are included.
Ken Imoto (Mon,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: