This study analyzes four alternative cycle configurations for the traditional vapor compression system used in conventional, hybrid, and electric vehicles, taking low-GWP alternatives for the substitution of R134a. These are cycle with an internal heat exchanger and thermostatic expansion valve (IHX + TEV); cycle with an internal heat exchanger and short tube (IHX + ST); cycle with an ejector (EC); and cycle with an ejector and internal heat exchanger (EC + IHX). Similarly, the energy, exergy, exergoeconomic, and environmental impact of these configurations were analyzed using synthetic refrigerants with a GWP of less than 150. The results indicate that, using the EC + IHX configuration, the COP for refrigerants R1234yf, R1234ze(E), R1243zf, and R516A is the highest, increasing by more than 20%. Using R1243zf in the EC configuration can reduce the total cost ratio compared to other refrigerants. On the other hand, the use of IHX cycle configurations with R444A and R445A decreases the exergy efficiency and increases the total cost ratio by up to 35% and 70%, respectively. Additionally, the Total Equivalent Warming Impact (TEWI) analysis showed reductions up to 20% for ejector cycle configurations using R1234ze(E), R1234yf, R1243zf, and R516A.
Méndez-Méndez et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: