Introduction: Trauma systems are crucial for enhancing survival and quality of life for trauma patients. Understanding trauma triage and patient outcomes is essential for optimizing resource allocation and trauma care. The aim was to explore prehospital trauma triage in Region Zealand, Denmark. Specifically, characteristics for patients who were either primarily admitted or secondarily transferred to Major Trauma Centers were described. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study of severely injured trauma patients was conducted from January 2017 to December 2021. Results: The study comprised 744 patients, including 55.6% primary and 44.4% secondary patients. Overall, men accounted for 70.2% of patients, and 66.1% were aged 18-65 years. The secondary patients included more women - 34.2% vs. 26.3% and a higher proportion of Injury Severity Score of ≥15 - 59.6% vs. 47.8%, compared to primary patients. 30-day survival was higher for secondary patients - 92.7% vs 87%. Medical dispatchers assessed urgency as Emergency level A for 98.1% of primary patients and 86.3% of secondary patients. Physician-staffed prehospital units attended primary patients first more frequently - 17.1% vs. 3.5%. Response times were similar, but time at the scene was longer for primary patients, whereas time from injury to arrival at a Major Trauma Center was longer for secondary patients. Conclusion: Secondary trauma patients had higher Injury Severity Scores and better survival rates. They were considered less urgent by medical dispatchers and less frequently assessed by physician-staffed units. Prospective quality data are needed for further investigation of optimal triage and continuous quality improvement in trauma care.
Møller et al. (Sun,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: