In Ref. Markos (2025), Markos and Hlubina argue that “contrary to the expectations of Hirsch” (Hirsch, 2020) the conventional theory of superconductivity correctly describes the dynamics of the Meissner effect. Here I point out the flaws in their arguments that render them invalid, and propose an experiment to shed further light on these issues. • Markos and Hlubina claim that the conventional theory of superconductivity describes the dynamics of the Meissner effect. • Their paper claims that Hirsch’s claim to the contrary is wrong. • I show that Markos and Hlubina’s argument is deeply flawed. • I propose an experiment that can decide who is right and wrong.
J.E. Hirsch (Sun,) studied this question.