Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) is rapidly transforming higher education by introducing new mechanisms for supporting the development of advanced cognitive processes and research-related capabilities. This study examines how postgraduate students employ GAI to develop their cognitive and research talent, conceptualized here as higher-order academic skills such as analysis, synthesis, and critical reasoning, across six domains: literature review, theoretical development, research design, data analysis, academic writing, ethical use, and challenges encountered—signaled explicitly rather than listed line by line. We administered a validated multidimensional scale to 214 postgraduate students, and the results indicate a moderate overall use of GAI, with notably high involvement in practices that emphasize ethics and responsibility. Students reported clear cognitive benefits in tasks involving information processing, linguistic refinement, and conceptual clarification while showing caution toward delegating higher-order analytical or theoretical reasoning to AI systems. Key challenges included limited institutional training, concerns about data privacy and academic integrity, and difficulties evaluating the originality and reliability of AI-generated content. Inferential analyses indicated significant differences based on gender, academic level, and general technology proficiency, whereas no differences emerged across age groups, departments, or specializations. Overall, this study demonstrates how GAI can contribute to the development of higher-level cognitive skills and research competencies, with “moderate use” operationalized as consistent but selective engagement across domains, while underscoring the need for structured training, clear guidelines, and teaching approaches that foster the responsible and effective incorporation of AI within postgraduate research. The results highlight practical implications for higher education, including the importance of institutional training programs, governance frameworks for responsible AI use, and pedagogical models that foster critical engagement with GAI.
Ibrahim et al. (Thu,) studied this question.