The Circulatory Model of Physics derives physical predictions from five integer axioms (N=3, DB=8, DM=6, DT=8, D=22) with zero free parameters. This paper subjects the framework to three independent falsification tests against the numerology hypothesis: (1) an exhaustive constraint analysis proving the axiom set is uniquely determined, (2) a Monte Carlo joint precision test against 100, 000 random integer theories yielding p = 9. 0e-5, and (3) an information-theoretic analysis showing 8. 2x compression of physical information. The fine structure constant prediction alone (0. 0015% error, p = 5. 0e-6) independently rejects the null hypothesis. Six falsifiability criteria are identified for future experimental scrutiny.
Brehnan Jones (Wed,) studied this question.