Understanding how geometry governs interfacial contact and material removal is central to designing efficient bioinspired surface systems. Gastropod radular teeth form natural arrays of microscale cutting elements optimized for repeated interaction with compliant and semi-rigid substrates, yet experimentally validated shape–performance relationships remain limited. Here, we isolate geometric effects on interfacial mechanics using stereolithography-printed biomimetic tooth arrays inspired by the taenioglossan radula of the hard-substrate grazer Spekia zonata. Two morphologically distinct tooth types (central and marginal) were systematically varied in cusp and stylus geometry (four variants each), while array configuration, material, and boundary conditions were kept constant. Tooth stiffness was quantified in bending tests as load-induced height reduction. Interfacial performance was assessed using a controlled pull-through assay in agarose substrates of two stiffness levels (0.4% and 0.8%), with continuous force recording and measurement of removed mass. Marginal-tooth geometries were stiffer and consistently removed more substrate than central variants. Although work increased substantially in stiffer gels, removal did not scale proportionally and declined for central teeth, revealing a decoupling between mechanical input and yield. Performance correlated with active engagement rather than work alone, indicating geometry-limited contact regimes. These findings establish geometry-controlled stiffness and engagement as key parameters for efficient abrasive interfaces.
Krings et al. (Fri,) studied this question.