PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
August 1, 2002AJP Heart and Circulatory Physiology405 citations

Myocardial function defined by strain rate and strain during alterations in inotropic states and heart rate

View Full Paper
FWFrank WeidemannFJFadi JamalGSGeorge R. Sutherland

Structured PICO

Do systolic strain and peak systolic strain rate accurately reflect stroke volume and contractility during alterations in inotropic states and heart rate in normal porcine myocardium?

P
Population
Porcine myocardium model (n=20 total; atrial pacing group n=7, dobutamine infusion group n=7, esmolol infusion group n=6)
I
Intervention
Alterations in heart rate and contractility via atrial pacing (120-180 beats/min), incremental dobutamine infusion (2.5-20 microg/kg/min), or continuous esmolol infusion (0.5 mg/kg/min) with subsequent pacing (120-180 beats/min)
C
Comparator
Baseline state prior to pacing or infusion
O
Outcome
Ultrasonic regional deformation parameters: systolic strain (epsilon(sys)) and peak systolic strain rate (SR(sys)), compared with stroke volume (SV) and contractility index (CI)surrogate

In normal porcine myocardium, peak systolic strain rate reflects regional contractile function independent of heart rate, while systolic strain reflects changes in stroke volume.

Abstract

For porcine myocardium, ultrasonic regional deformation parameters, systolic strain (epsilon(sys)) and peak systolic strain rate (SR(sys)), were compared with stroke volume (SV) and contractility contractility index (CI) measured as the ratio of end-systolic strain to end-systolic wall stress. Heart rate (HR) and contractility were varied by atrial pacing (AP = 120-180 beats/min, n = 7), incremental dobutamine infusion (DI = 2.5-20 microg. kg(-1). min(-1), n = 7), or continuous esmolol infusion (0.5 mg. kg(-1). min(-1)) + subsequent pacing (120-180 beats/min) (EI group, n = 6). Baseline SR(sys) and epsilon(sys) averaged 5.0 +/- 0.4 s(-1) and 60 +/- 4%. SR(sys) and CI increased linearly with DI (20 microg. kg(-1). min(-1); SR(sys) = 9.9 +/- 0.7 s(-1), P < 0.0001) and decreased with EI (SR(sys) = 3.4 +/- 0.1 s(-1), P < 0.01). During pacing, SR(sys) and CI remained unchanged in the AP and EI groups. During DI, epsilon(sys) and SV initially increased (5 microg. kg(-1). min(-1); epsilon(sys) = 77 +/- 6%, P < 0.01) and then progressively returned to baseline. During EI, SV and epsilon(sys) decreased (epsilon(sys) = 38 +/- 2%, P < 0.001). Pacing also decreased SV and epsilon(sys) in the AP (180 beats/min; epsilon(sys) = 36 +/- 2%, P < 0.001) and EI groups (180 beats/min; epsilon(sys) = 25 +/- 3%, P < 0.001). Thus, for normal myocardium, SR(sys) reflects regional contractile function (being relatively independent of HR), whereas epsilon(sys) reflects changes in SV.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Weidemann et al. (2002) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69d5716975589c71d767e179https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00025.2002
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper