Why the study?
Do systolic strain and peak systolic strain rate accurately reflect stroke volume and contractility during alterations in inotropic states and heart rate in normal porcine myocardium?
Do systolic strain and peak systolic strain rate accurately reflect stroke volume and contractility during alterations in inotropic states and heart rate in normal porcine myocardium?
In normal porcine myocardium, peak systolic strain rate reflects regional contractile function independent of heart rate, while systolic strain reflects changes in stroke volume.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Differentiates strain rate from strain for contractility assessment in animals; leaves open clinical translation.
For porcine myocardium, ultrasonic regional deformation parameters, systolic strain (epsilon(sys)) and peak systolic strain rate (SR(sys)), were compared with stroke volume (SV) and contractility [contractility index (CI)] measured as the ratio of end-systolic strain to end-systolic wall stress. Heart rate (HR) and contractility were varied by atrial pacing (AP = 120-180 beats/min, n = 7), incremental dobutamine infusion (DI = 2.5-20 microg. kg(-1). min(-1), n = 7), or continuous esmolol infusion (0.5 mg. kg(-1). min(-1)) + subsequent pacing (120-180 beats/min) (EI group, n = 6). Baseline SR(sys) and epsilon(sys) averaged 5.0 +/- 0.4 s(-1) and 60 +/- 4%. SR(sys) and CI increased linearly with DI (20 microg. kg(-1). min(-1); SR(sys) = 9.9 +/- 0.7 s(-1), P < 0.0001) and decreased with EI (SR(sys) = 3.4 +/- 0.1 s(-1), P < 0.01). During pacing, SR(sys) and CI remained unchanged in the AP and EI groups. During DI, epsilon(sys) and SV initially increased (5 microg. kg(-1). min(-1); epsilon(sys) = 77 +/- 6%, P < 0.01) and then progressively returned to baseline. During EI, SV and epsilon(sys) decreased (epsilon(sys) = 38 +/- 2%, P < 0.001). Pacing also decreased SV and epsilon(sys) in the AP (180 beats/min; epsilon(sys) = 36 +/- 2%, P < 0.001) and EI groups (180 beats/min; epsilon(sys) = 25 +/- 3%, P < 0.001). Thus, for normal myocardium, SR(sys) reflects regional contractile function (being relatively independent of HR), whereas epsilon(sys) reflects changes in SV.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weidemann et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: