Purpose Currently, the organisational culture of Applied Arts’ spaces is bound by interlinked, oppressive/privileged systems using terms such as the ableist ”handmade”. This article details using Intuitive Interspecies Communication (IIC) to uncloak the proficient and multitudinous making skills of nonhuman-animals, from their own viewpoint. This simultaneously acknowledges individual nonhuman-animal artisanship and dismantles oppressive arts language. Design/methodology/approach IIC is one of my innate skills. Using unstructured IIC interviews, nonhuman-animal artisans explain their materials and modalities. Acting as a transcriber and reflective/reflexive practitioner, I then create art jewellery to disseminate concepts from the interview data. Findings Making as directed from the perspective of nonhuman-animal artisans reveals multiple oppressive/privileged biases ingrained in the Applied Arts, impacting how we attribute objects made by nonhuman-animals and those created by humans with hands-free technology. The resulting non-bodycentric language provides an environment where all making is valid. Originality/value Centralising nonhuman-animal voices and reframing their “instinctually”-made objects as decisionmade recognises “universal multispecies creativity” (Gigliotti, 2022). This engenders compassion for fellow makers of all species oppressed by the Applied Arts’ kyriarchal systems.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Inga Dawn Hamilton
Journal of Organizational Ethnography
University of Sunderland
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Inga Dawn Hamilton (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69d895be6c1944d70ce06c79 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/joe-02-2024-0010
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: