Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Why have systems of “transnational private regulation ” recently emerged to certify corporate social and environmental performance? Different conceptions of institutional emergence underlie different answers to this question. Many scholars argue that firms create certification systems to solve problems in the market—a view rooted in a conception of institutions as solutions to collective action problems. The author develops a different account by viewing institutions as the outcome of political contestation and by analyzing conflict and institutional entrepreneurship among a wide array of actors. Using a comparative case study design, the analysis shows how these arguments explain the formation of social and environmental certification associations. Both theoretical approaches are needed, but strong versions of the market-based approach overlook an important set of dynamics that the author calls the “political construction of market institutions. ” The analysis shows how both problem solving in markets and political contention generate new institutional forms. At least since Polanyi’s (1944) The Great Transformation, social scientists have debated the nature of attempts to embed modern capitalism in social standards. While much of this work examines state regulation of the conditions of production, today a new set of transformations is occurring, as standard setting and regulation are increasingly being accomplished through private means. This includes not only traditional programs of 1
Tim Bartley (Tue,) studied this question.