Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The incidence of intimate partner violence (IPV) varies according to IPV definitions and data collection approaches. The criminal Justice system assesses IPV through a review of the evidence gathered by the police and the court hearings. We aimed to determine the association between IPV, as identified in criminal Justice disposition records, and subsequent healthcare-identified intentional injury inflicted by others, including violent death. We conducted a retrospective population-based matched-cohort study using linked multisectoral databases. Female adult Manitoba residents identified as victims of IPV in provincial prosecution and disposition records 2004 to 2016 (n = 20,469) were matched to three non-victims (n = 61,407) of similar age, relationship status and place of residence at the date of the IPV incident. Outcomes were first healthcare use for intentional injury and violent death, assessed in Emergency Department visits, hospitalizations and Vital Statistics deaths records. Conditional Cox Regression was used to obtain Hazard Ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). The risk of intentional injury was 8.5 per 1000 women among non-victims of IPV and 55.8 per 1000 women among IPV victims. The Hazard Ratios associated with IPV were 3.8 (95% CI: 3.4, 4.3) for intentional injury and 4.6 (95% CI: 2.3, 9.2) for violent death, after adjustment. IPV victims experienced half the risk of subsequent intentional injury if the accused received a probation sentence. Our findings suggest that Justice involvement represents an opportunity for intersectoral collaborative prevention of subsequent intentional injury among IPV victims.
Nesca et al. (Tue,) studied this question.