Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
The quality of image reconstructions from discrete data suffers not only from the blurring of spatial detail caused by limitations in the spatial frequency response of electrooptical systems, but also from the aliasing generated if spatial detail has been undersampled. P. Mertz and F. Grey Bell Syst. Tech. J. 13, 464 (1934) and O. H. Schade J. Soc. Motion Pict. Telev. Eng. 56, 131 (1955); 58, 181 (1952); 61, 97 (1953); 64, 593 (1955) have observed that reasonable spot intensity profiles and photosensor aperture shapes of equivalent size result in about equal blurring but that some profiles and shapes suppress aliasing better than others. This paper presents quantitative results of the magnitude of aliasing and blurring as a function of random radiancefields typical for natural scenes and of spatial responses and sampling intervals typical for TV cameras and optical-mechanical scanners. These results indicate that aliasing may often be a larger source of degradation than either blurring or electronic noise.
Huck et al. (Tue,) studied this question.