To evaluate the feasibility of a low-cost augmented reality (AR) workflow for ultrasound-guided venipuncture and whether AR visualisation is non-inferior to conventional monitor guidance in total procedure time while improving user experience. Real-time ultrasound video from a conventional scanner was captured via an HDMI-to-USB device, pre-processed with a Python/OpenCV pipeline, and streamed over Wi-Fi to a HoloLens 2 headset using WebSocket. A turkey-thigh model with an embedded fluid-filled catheter simulated a peripheral vein. One experienced implantation nurse performed 58 venipuncture attempts with standard monitor guidance and 58 with AR (monitor blanked during AR). Total procedure time (TPT) was recorded for each attempt, and a questionnaire assessed perceived difficulty, image quality, usability, reliability, and ergonomic comfort. With all data included, overall TPT was comparable between standard and AR guidance (Formula: see text s vs. Formula: see text s; Formula: see text). After excluding predefined outliers, overall TPT remained non-significantly lower with AR (Formula: see text s vs. Formula: see text s; Formula: see text); on day 2 the p-value decreased to 0.103 (Formula: see text s vs. Formula: see text s). Questionnaire responses favoured AR for gaze continuity, perceived coordination, usability, and ergonomic comfort, with acceptable image quality. AR-assisted ultrasound-guided venipuncture was feasible and did not add measurable temporal overhead for an expert operator, while improving perceived ergonomics. Larger, multi-operator clinical studies are needed to confirm performance effects and clinical impact.
Aliani et al. (Wed,) studied this question.