Transportation asset management (TAM) has traditionally centered on technical performance and economic efficiency. In recent years, however, there has been increasing recognition of the environmental and social impacts of maintenance and rehabilitation (M&R) activities. This paper presents a systematic review of how Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics are being incorporated into TAM. Using PRISMA 2020, four major databases were searched, identifying 75 studies since 2010. Environmental metrics were the most developed, especially those measuring emissions, energy use, and material consumption. Social metrics appeared less frequently and are typically used descriptively, including indicators of income inequality, user costs, and equity-focused metrics such as the Benefit Distribution Ratio and Social Return on Investment. Governance was the least explored pillar and is generally addressed through fiscal transparency, risk management, or institutional practices rather than explicit measurable indicators. Overall, the review shows growing interest in integrating ESG into TAM, but the adoption of social and governance metrics remains limited. In particular, governance indicators are rarely operationalized as measurable variables within TAM decision-making, highlighting a critical gap in the literature. This study synthesizes ESG-related indicators used in TAM and provides a structured foundation for future research and more comprehensive sustainability-oriented decision frameworks.
Ahmadi et al. (Sun,) studied this question.