Contemporary emergency systems operate at the intersection of climate volatility, digital interdependence, and cascading institutional disruptions. Despite growing research on resilience, adaptive governance, and digital transformation, these fields remain largely disconnected, leaving a theoretical gap in explaining how emergency systems perform under compound uncertainty. This integrative review synthesizes 32 peer-reviewed articles (post-2020) using structured narrative methodology and VOSviewer bibliometric analysis to map the field’s intellectual architecture and identify its structural gaps. The analysis reveals six thematic clusters organized around resilience as the central construct, yet characterized by three recurring disconnections: the weak integration between digital transformation and governance theory, the operational underdevelopment of polycentric governance frameworks, and the temporal separation between emergency response and climate adaptation. Drawing on this structural diagnosis, the study advances the Complex Adaptive Governance (CAG) model—a three-layer framework encompassing systemic architecture, adaptive mechanisms, and operational resilience—in which digital interoperability functions as a cross-cutting accelerator. The CAG model reconceptualizes resilience as a relational property of governance ecosystems, enhanced by digital interoperability, and offers design principles for climate-resilient emergency systems aligned with SDG 9, SDG 11, SDG 13, and SDG 16.
Bogdan et al. (Sat,) studied this question.