Elyon-Sol is a governance-first, pre-execution substrate that determines whether an interaction is allowed to exist prior to any policy evaluation, intelligence, or execution. The system enforces deterministic refusal under a fail-closed model through three independent invariants: AC³ (Authority) — validates that all required authority conditions are present and legitimate T²⁶ (Coverage) — ensures that all required participants, roles, and supporting elements are complete CCS (Continuity) — enforces structural and semantic consistency across system state transitions Eligibility is computed as: G(I) = AC³(I) ∧ T²⁶(I) ∧ CCS(sₜ, sₜ₊₁, I) Producing one of two outcomes: ELIGIBLE REFUSE Version 0.9.7.1 represents the canonical release and includes a formally defined invariant system, a tightened and operationalized continuity constraint (CCS), worked evaluation examples, and empirical interaction cases mapped to invariant failures. This revision introduces Appendix D, a clarificatory, non-expansive addendum that: formalizes operational sufficiency under a fail-closed evaluation model provides a true-positive (ELIGIBLE) evaluation case demonstrates CCS as an independent failure condition positions Elyon-Sol relative to existing access control and governance models No new invariants, behaviors, or system components are introduced. Elyon-Sol operates strictly as a non-executing governance layer. It does not perform actions or replace policy engines; it determines whether interactions are permitted to exist. The system is: deterministic fail-closed identity-agnostic pre-policy and pre-execution This release is considered structurally complete, internally consistent, empirically grounded, and externally verifiable. It serves as a stable reference implementation of a pre-execution governance substrate. Future work, if any, is limited to observational validation and domain-specific application without modification to the core system.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Justin LaPorte
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Justin LaPorte (Wed,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0bfa553a5433e34b575d — DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19694153
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: