While polyurethane acoustic foam is widely used in entertainment settings for sound absorption, it poses a considerable fire risk when exposed to sparks from pyrotechnic devices. Even though fountain-type pyrotechnic devices are often perceived as producing “cold sparks”, the ignition potential of a single incandescent particle remains insufficiently quantified. This study experimentally investigates the ignition capacity of a fountain-type pyrotechnic article on pyramidal polyurethane acoustic foam under controlled conditions. Three dedicated experimental configurations were developed: (i) ignition probability tests at various distances, (ii) scaled configuration tests reproducing realistic installation geometry, and (iii) high-speed visualization of single incandescent particle interaction with the foam surface. For the first two configurations, ignition probabilities of 20% and 22.2% were obtained. High-speed recordings showed two distinct interaction mechanisms: particle fragmentation and ricochet, which did not result in ignition; partial penetration with localized melting, volatile release, and gas-phase ignition when residual thermal energy (about 0.5–1 J) was retained. The results demonstrate that even isolated single incandescent particles generated under realistic conditions can initiate the combustion of polyurethane acoustic foam. These findings challenge the “cold spark” safety perception and provide quantitative evidence that particle–induced ignition represents a significant fire hazard in enclosed environments where combustible acoustic materials and pyrotechnic effects coexist. The findings in this paper have direct implications for safety regulations in entertainment venues.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Maria Prodan
Emilian Ghicioi
National Institute for Research and Development in Environmental Protection
George Artur Găman
Universitatea Din Petrosani
Fire
Universitatea Din Petrosani
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Prodan et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec59fc88ba6daa22dab9bb — DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/fire9050180