Abstract Objective Using 15 years of hospital survey data (2008-2023), we examined rural–urban trends in electronic health records (EHR) adoption and advanced capabilities for data sharing, public health reporting, and care improvements. Materials and Methods We conducted a repeated cross-sectional study using the American Hospital Association Annual Survey Information Technology Supplement (2008-2018, 2020-2023). We constructed hospital-year measures of basic and comprehensive EHR capability, certified EHR technology (CEHRT) adoption, and advanced functions in patient engagement, interoperability, public health reporting, and social determinants of health (SDOH). We compared rural and urban adoption using descriptive analyses, Cochran-Armitage trend tests, and logistic regression with clustered standard errors, adjusted for bed size, ownership, and census division. Results The cohort included 41 838 hospital-years (45% rural). Comprehensive capability rose from 2% in 2008 to 75% in 2020, and CEHRT was nearly universal by 2023. Rural hospitals lagged urban hospitals in adopting basic and comprehensive EHRs, with the gap peaking at 25% in 2016. By 2021-2023, most hospitals reported patient portals, interoperability, public health reporting, and SDOH capabilities. Rural hospitals remained 4%-15% behind urban peers in advanced functions, particularly interoperability, public health reporting, and SDOH data collection and use. Discussion Persistent rural–urban gaps in advanced EHR use may limit interoperability, data-driven care, and public health reporting in rural settings. Conclusion EHR adoption is widespread, but substantial rural–urban gaps persist in advanced EHR use. Support for advanced capabilities that enable data sharing, reporting, and data-driven improvement is needed to ensure that rural hospitals and communities benefit from digital transformation beyond adoption.
Anzalone et al. (Fri,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: