Faults in aero-engine rotating components account for more than 60% of total failures, and their early features are easily masked by noise under complex conditions. Traditional single-sensor diagnosis suffers from low feature utilization, poor interpretability, and weak cross-condition generalization. This paper proposes a multi-source fault diagnosis method for aero-engines based on an explainable boosted tree, integrating spatiotemporal attention (STA) and adaptive feature selection (AFS). We collect multi-domain data from four standard core sensors widely used in existing engine health management systems and extract multi-dimensional features to build a heterogeneous feature set. Adaptive feature selection is implemented using mutual information and a variance inflation factor. A spatiotemporal attention mechanism is introduced to weight and fuse features effectively. The fused features are used to train an XGBoost classifier, and SHAP values are adopted to quantify feature contributions and improve model interpretability. Uncertainty sources and sensitivity boundaries are quantitatively analyzed to support engineering acceptance. The method achieves high sensitivity to early weak faults and stable uncertainty under complex operating conditions. Tests on a fault simulation test rig show that the proposed method achieves 99.2% diagnosis accuracy and 97.5% cross-condition generalization accuracy, outperforming conventional models. It can identify early weak fault signatures, clarify key fault indicators, and provide a quantitative basis for fault tracing and maintenance decision-making. The method employs a standard sensor suite without additional hardware costs, features lightweight computation and low inference overhead, and delivers clear economic benefits by reducing false alarms, avoiding unplanned downtime, and optimizing maintenance resources. It offers a reliable, cost-effective solution for aero-engine fault diagnosis under complex operating conditions.
Zhou et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: