Background: Echocardiography is a non-invasive test that is readily used to detect pulmonary hypertension associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD-PH) and right ventricular failure (RVF). However, the most feasible, reproducible and accurate parameters to measure and use for guidance in addressing patient care have not been established and may differ between subspecialties. Methods: We surveyed members of the BPD Collaborative to determine how different care providers clinically evaluate infants for BPD-PH and RVF. Perceived challenges and obstacles that limit the utility of echocardiography are also reported. Results: Of the 108 survey respondents from ~45 centers, 55.6% were neonatologists, 18.5% were pediatric pulmonologists or pediatric intensive care physicians, 15.7% were pediatric cardiologists or pulmonary hypertension specialists, and 10.2% were other providers. Responses revealed discrepancies between specialists concerning the use of standard echocardiographic protocols and parameters that can be measured serially with relative ease, metrics that should be used to best define and distinguish the severity of BPD-PH or RVF, and parameter values that should be used to determine whether changes in PH-targeted medical therapies, hemodynamic or respiratory support are needed. Free text responses identified patient-, protocol-, cardiology-, technician-, and BPD-PH definition-related obstacles that may limit the reliable utility of echocardiography. Conclusions: Although most providers agree that echocardiography is feasible and of value, variability exists between subspecialists and centers, suggesting the need for improved standardization of imaging protocols and BPD-PH definition, consistent test interpretation, and effective communication of results to improve the reproducibility and accuracy of echocardiography in infants with BPD.
Vyas‐Read et al. (Tue,) studied this question.