What question did this study set out to answer?

This program aimed to enhance the mentoring capacity of early-stage investigators specifically in community-engaged research (CER).

May 9, 2026Open Access

280 Community engaged research mentoring: A tailored approach to growing early-stage investigators’ capacity and networks in conducting CER

Key Points

This program aimed to enhance the mentoring capacity of early-stage investigators specifically in community-engaged research (CER).
9-month dedicated mentoring program with a focus on CER.
Cohorts of four mentees paired with one community mentor, supported by CTSC staff.
Targeted coaching for mentors to improve guidance and satisfaction.
High satisfaction reported by both mentors and mentees.
Mentees indicated skill development in project design and grant writing.
100% of mentors and mentees expressed interest in future participation.

Abstract

Objectives/Goals: Mentoring is essential for the development of investigators, and while many mentorship programs exist, few focus exclusively on the challenges associated with community-engaged research (CER). This program focused on forging lasting mentoring relationships with CER experts and strengthening connections with community partners. Methods/Study Population: The 9-month program focused on: Exclusive focus on CER mentorship. The curriculum drew on best practices from CTSC partner institutions (Emory University, University of Wisconsin-Madison) and local expertise from the NIH-funded U54 Investigator Development Core. Prior work identified the lack of CER-specific mentorship as a barrier to success, prompting the creation of this dedicated program. Small cohorts with community mentors: Each bi-monthly cohort comprised four mentees and one community mentor, supported by CTSC staff. This structure created a safe space for sharing project challenges and offered grounded perspectives on community-partner needs and expectations. Mentor coaching mentors received targeted coaching, enhancing their capacity to guide mentees and boosting overall mentor satisfaction. Results/Anticipated Results: Evaluation surveys captured satisfaction, confidence, and likelihood of continued participation. Key findings include * High Satisfaction: Both mentors and mentees reported strong satisfaction with program elements. * Skill Development: Mentees cited support across project design, grant development, networking, and policy work. * Future Participation: 100 % of mentors and mentees indicated they would join again or recommend the program to colleagues. * Community Impact: Participants highlighted the program’s sense of community, passion, and peer support. Discussion/Significance of Impact: This CER mentoring program addresses a critical gap: traditional career mentors often focus on clinical or academic specialties, overlooking the unique challenges of building equitable community partnerships. By centering mentorship on CER and incorporating coach-driven mentor development, the program fosters bidirectional growth.

Demander à l'IA

Bookmark

View Full Paper