This record is Paper 2 of the Signal-Time-Authority (STA) Series. Paper 2 provides staged C++17 synthetic toy-simulation evidence for the STA pre-commitment controllability framework introduced in Paper 1: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19980763 The report consolidates Stage 1 through Stage 8 results, including falsification, component ablation, revised ablation, boundary sensitivity, human latency thresholds, Safety Slack calibration, domain-specific deep runs, full STA-control ladder tests, and replication. The results support a narrow synthetic claim: STA control coupling has measurable control value in the toy benchmark, and harm-bounded policy choice matters. The report does not claim real-world validation, does not prove AI safety, and does not claim that the full ladder is universally best. PublicRelease v1.0.1 packaging correction: This version adds the previously omitted Stage 3 Boundary Sensitivity artifact ZIP to the Paper 2 artifact package. No manuscript claims, reported metrics, simulation results, interpretation, or claim boundary have changed. The correction improves artifact completeness and reproducibility.
Htet Ko Ko Naing (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: