Changing language, changes lives: Learning the lexicon of LGBTQ+ health equity

Lesbian, gay, bisexual, pansexual, transgender, nonbinary, two-spirit, queer, questioning, and other sexual and gender diverse-identified people (i.e., LGBTQ+1) represent a heterogeneous group of communities. These communities have gained significant social acceptance and legal protections in the United States over the last decade, although those hard-fought advancements remain tenuous. Complex multilevel stigma (e.g., individual, interpersonal, and structural) continues to impact how health systems provide person-centered care to LGBTQ+ people, which negatively impacts their health outcomes. In addition, compulsory heterosexuality and cisgenderism, that is, heterosexuality and cisgenderism are assumed and enforced upon people by a heterocisnormative society (Rich, 1980), in nursing perpetuate stigma within the health care setting (Chinn, 2008; Searle, 2019), rendering LGBTQ+ nurses invisible. As we continue our series on learning the language of health equity, this paper seeks to advance our understanding of culturally sensitive and person-centered language to support nurses, midwives, and researchers in advancing health equity among LGBTQ+ communities. Nurses, midwives, and researchers should be cognizant of the nuances between sex, gender, and sexuality. Sex, gender, and sexuality are multidimensional concepts that are often conflated, misunderstood, and even politicized. However, everyone has a sex, gender, and sexuality—even you. Sex is based on a cluster of anatomical and physiological traits, that is, external genitalia, secondary sex characteristics, gonads, chromosomes, and hormones. Sex is assigned at birth as female, male, or intersex/differences of sex development. Gender encompasses identity, expression, and social-cultural norms or expectations associated with specific sex traits. Gender identities include, but are not limited to, cisgender, nonbinary, gender fluid, transgender, and two-spirit. Sexuality (also called sexual orientation) encompasses components such as emotional, romantic, and/or sexual attraction, sexual identity, and sexual behavior. Sexual identities include, but are not limited to, bisexual, gay, heterosexual, lesbian, pansexual, same-gender loving, two-spirit, queer, and questioning. Table 1 provides further details regarding these constructs and identities. Female Male Intersex/differences of sex development Man (cisgenderb or transgenderc) Woman (cisgender or transgender) Nonbinaryd Gender fluid Two-spirite Asexual Bisexual Gay Heterosexual Lesbian Pansexual Same-gender loving Two-spirit Queer Questioning Recent estimates suggest that 6.8% of the U.S. adult population identifies as sexually diverse (i.e., the LGBQ+ communities of the LGBTQ+ umbrella; Jones, 2022) and 0.5%–0.7% as gender diverse (i.e., the T communities)—which is more than a 200% increase from estimates a decade earlier (Herman et al., 2022; Jones, 2022). These estimates are theorized to be much lower than actual population levels, however, due to complications with assessment and disclosure deterrents (e.g., stigma and victimization). A growing LGBTQ+ population may be driven by younger generations, as 20.8% of Generation Z (born between 1997 and 2003) identify as LGBTQ+ (Jones, 2022). Increased community size may be further driven by improved methodological approaches to identify LGBTQ+ individuals implemented over the last decade through research and advocacy. A 2011 Institute of Medicine (IOM) report entitled The Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender People provided a state of the science on the unique health disparities LGBTQ+ individuals experience (Institute of Medicine, 2011). The IOM report prompted the National Institutes of Health to create the Sexual and Gender Minority Research Office (SGMRO) in 2015 and to formally designate sexual and gender minority2 (i.e., LGBTQ+) people as a health disparity population in 2016 (Perez-Stable, 2016). Subsequently, funding for LGBTQ+ health research and collection of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data in nationally representative samples have substantially increased (SGMRO, 2022a, 2022b). So, too, has the availability of SOGI fields in electronic health records (Cahill et al., 2016). Yet, continued efforts are needed to support researchers, policymakers, and clinicians in identifying disparities, establishing policies that promote equity, and providing high-quality, person-centered care to LGBTQ+ people. LGBTQ+ people have existed globally throughout history, with the first recordings going back 5000 years (Peralta, 2011; Schott, 2016). For centuries, LGBTQ+ people have been persecuted (e.g., sanctioned death penalties, incarceration) under the guise of “anti-sodomy laws” and “public indecency” prohibitions for dressing in a manner that was socially attributed to the opposite sex. Not until the 20th century was being an LGBTQ+ person decriminalized in the United States, and antidiscrimination legislation based on sexuality and gender has yet to be realized in all 50 states. For example, The Equality Act (2021), a bill that would amend the Civil Rights Act (1964) to expand antidiscrimination protections to LGBTQ+ people in public spaces, is currently awaiting a vote in the U.S. Senate. As more than 50% of LGBTQ+ adults experience harassment or discrimination in public places (Gruberg et al., 2020), this legal protection is paramount to LGBTQ+ peoples' health and wellbeing. Furthermore, compulsory sterilization requirements were recently outlawed by the European Convention in 2017, but the practice persists globally (Stack, 2017; The Associated Press; 2019). In fact, it remains a punishable crime in 15 countries to cross-dress and in 69 jurisdictions to engage in private, consensual same-sex sexual activity; in 11 of those jurisdictions, the death penalty is legally possible (Afghanistan, Brunei, Mauritania, Pakistan, Qatar, and United Arab Emirates) or actively implemented (Iran, Northern Nigeria, Saudia Arabia, Somalia, and Yemen; Human Dignity Trust, 2022; Sherman et al., 2021a). The legal protections gained for LGBTQ+ people continue to be under threat. In 2022 alone, over 300 anti-LGBTQ+ bills have been introduced in state legislatures in the United States, with over 70% of the states signing or introducing anti-LGBTQ+ bills into law (Human Rights Campaign, 2022). For example, Florida's “Don't Say Gay” bill banned classroom instruction on SOGI topics (Parental Rights in Education, 2022). Yet, most bills have targeted transgender youth, including banning access to medically necessary and evidence-based care endorsed by major medical associations (American Psychological Association, 2020; Korioth, 2021; Madara, 2021) and fueled by scientific misinformation (Lepore et al., 2022). Similar anti-LGBTQ+ legislation has also been introduced globally, including in the United Kingdom, Poland, Hungary, Singapore, and Afghanistan. In the United States, the National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioners and Society for Pediatric Nurses signed an amicus brief in support of providing health care for transgender youth (Brandt American Nurses Association (ANA), 2018; Sedlak Hendricks Meyer, 2003). Within health care systems, discrimination and mistreatment are common experiences for LGBTQ+ people. LGBTQ+ people are often refused care and experience harsh or abusive language, unwanted physical contact, and physically rough or abusive care (Ayhan et al., 2019; Cicero et al., 2019; Gruberg et al., 2020). These experiences are heightened among both gender-diverse people and LGBTQ+ people from racial and ethnic minoritized groups (Gruberg et al., 2020). Discrimination, victimization, and stigmatization can impede care delivery, engender mistrust, and negatively impact LGBTQ+ individuals' mental and physical health outcomes (Hatzenbuehler, 2009; Ramsey et al., 2022; Soled, Dimant et al., 2022; Tyerman et al., 2021; White Hughto et al., 2015). Even the anticipation of discrimination is dangerous as about 15% of LGBTQ+ and 30% of gender-diverse adults will postpone or avoid medically necessary care out of fear of discrimination (Gruberg et al., 2020; Jaffee et al., 2016; Seelman et al., 2017). Stigma toward LGBTQ+ people may become evident in the health care setting through microaggressions, implicit bias (Sabin et al., 2015), and expressed discomfort in care for people with identities that differ from their own (Carabez et al., 2016). These attitudes do not stop at LGBTQ+ patients' experiences. The few existing studies of LGBTQ+ nurses highlight work-based stress related to their sexual and/or gender identities (Eliason et al., 2018), including experiences of homophobia, discrimination, and harassment from patients, peers, and supervisors (Eliason et al., 2011). As such, LGBTQ+ nurses may feel the need to hide their identity to avoid such negative consequences (Eliason et al., 2018; Randall Collins, 2000; Crenshaw, 1989; hooks, 1981; The Combahee River Collective, 1977). For example, intersections between gender and race and the resultant cisgenderism and racism are likely culprits for the exorbitantly disparate poor health outcomes for Black transgender women and femmes, including being 2.73 times more likely to die than other Black transgender people, 2.38 times more likely than Black cisgender men, and 2.43 times more likely than Black cisgender women (Hughes et al., 2022). Intersectional effects are consistently observed among a number of physical and mental health outcomes (Walubita et al., 2022; Zubizarreta et al., 2022). Within the health care system, this compounded discrimination among individuals with intersecting marginalized identities can further impact health negatively through inequities in health care access and receipt of lower quality treatment (Bosworth et al., 2021). The legacy of criminalization, pathologization, and stigma carried out through discriminatory language, as well as the historical trauma inflicted, requires intentional repair between systems of (e.g., health care and the LGBTQ+ community. communication is a of improved outcomes and person-centered care et al., 2022) including within LGBTQ+ research (e.g., gender identity in a of and research on should support development in health and (e.g., et al., including further of and of LGBTQ+ identities (e.g., et al., National of and Medicine 2022). As with LGBTQ+ language, data collection may be for sex, gender identity, and sexuality using language that and identifies LGBTQ+ people, the of sex as a with gender, the quality of data on LGBTQ+ and the research experience for LGBTQ+ 2022). is on the of or response to in a identity to in data and to The should the of identity response have language for SOGI data collection in Table using evidence-based from researchers, and LGBTQ+ community on of SOGI in 2016; et al., 2020; et al., 2016; et al., 2020). transgender cisgender transgender cisgender gender fluid, the is American or Two-spirit do not feel that identity into one of these do use to gender Male Female not to not to Sexual of the how of sexual identity Asexual Bisexual Gay Lesbian Pansexual Queer Same-gender loving is use a term not to Sexual the have sexual with all that Sexual of body of a person upon (e.g., sex, women Transgender women men Transgender men Two-spirit person sexual with gender not to Sexual the have been sexually to all that women Transgender women men Transgender men Two-spirit person with gender not to For those in LGBTQ+ a of population data with LGBTQ+ is and on the (SGMRO, as well as a multidimensional and to that LGBTQ+ health inequities research should be not historically and minoritized communities such as LGBTQ+ people. research can as an to community and as and their and on research as and The specific identities under should also be in community efforts (e.g., a on men should include men and transmasculine community in the research and funding an in these research to to in community such as community to be with and to research are et al., 2022; et al., 2022). also a in and to support and research et al., 2022; et al., 2020). and for research can be at the Research Institute and for Equality bias within insensitive language may the of person-centered particularly for those with multiply marginalized and to adverse health and health care outcomes et al., 2021; et al., 2022). in with earlier in this series for with and culturally communication is an in the of person-centered care et al., 2022). is through the person's and and the person instead of on a or et al., 2022). and care are necessary and approaches for communities that have experienced marginalization and trauma to promote physical and and repair heterocisnormativity, and health and health care outcomes et al., 2019; et al., 2021; et al., 2018; et al., to is to include an or anatomical et al., and a sexual and reproductive health et al., 2021) as to and sexual based on sex assigned at birth and or providing a a person has and has an or anatomical it and a body the assessment of body that an is and understanding of or health may be most to A sexual and reproductive health to sexual and reproductive A few of to include the person is having sex and body with that of their sexual It is also to about to or promote or sexually transmitted on the to the person and their sexual a assessment with and may be in in this (e.g., et al., 2019; et al., 2020; language should be are in Table the diversity of language and should be it is practice to the language for some language that is for to or would to further and to a understanding of language and that and promote person-centered and care within the (e.g., et al., 2021; Human Rights Campaign, et al., et al., 2021; et al., 2022). It is also that LGBTQ+ be in all of nursing and and other health as well as be as of for (Hughes et al., 2022; Sherman et al., some include et al., 2021; et al., 2015; or at birth Health and health Gender paper is a in learning the of LGBTQ+ health equity and efforts to promote and understanding of culturally sensitive and person-centered LGBTQ+ people are a growing population with health in by or language that and has to our and including the to and the the of LGBTQ+ language requires and with intentional practice will as nurses and midwives, we an to and everyone of a in using language that and we a in an for the for in the for to and the other and to the and of the was by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health of the National Institutes of Health under Sherman was by the National Institute of Research of the under The is the of the and does not represent the of the The of data are for this