ECG-gated computed tomography demonstrated 96.5% sensitivity for diagnosing mitral valve prolapse compared to TEE and 97.9% specificity for excluding obstructive CAD compared to ICA.
Cohort (n=391)
No
Does ECG-gated CT accurately identify mitral valve pathology and exclude obstructive CAD compared to TTE, TEE, and ICA in patients undergoing evaluation for mitral valve intervention?
ECG-gated CT provides a highly sensitive and specific non-invasive alternative to TEE and ICA for identifying mitral valve pathology and excluding significant CAD prior to mitral valve intervention.
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 96.5% (95% CI 92.5-98.7)
p-value: p=0.239
ECG-gated computed tomography (CT) is not commonly utilized as the primary imaging modality for the diagnosis and management of degenerative mitral valve (MV) disease and preparation for MV intervention typically involves the use of several imaging studies. We hypothesized that CT can accurately identify MV pathology and exclude obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in this population potentially obviating the need for routine use of additional imaging modalities. CT was compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal (TEE) echocardiography for identification of coronary artery patency and mitral valve pathology respectively in patients undergoing MV evaluation between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2023. 240 patients underwent TTE, TEE, and CT for mitral valve evaluation prior to intervention. Agreement was moderate when CT was compared to TTE for identifying prolapse (71%) and poor for flail segments (51%), with CT being superior. Compared to TEE, CT showed 96% agreement for prolapse (sensitivity 96.5%, CI 92.5–98.7% and specificity 82.3%, CI 71.2–90.5%) and 83% agreement for flail segments (sensitivity 75%, CI 67.8–81.8% and specificity 90.8%, CI 81.9–96.2%). Cohen’s κ statistic was 0.81 and 0.65 for prolapse and flail respectively. 215 patients underwent ICA and CT evaluation followed by valve intervention. CAD prevalence was low at 6.0%. Compared to ICA, CT was 83.3% sensitive (CI 58.6–96.4%) and 97.9% specific (CI 94.9–99.4%) for CAD with excellent agreement (Cohen’s κ = 0.81). As compared to TEE, CT has excellent sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing prolapse and good agreement for flail segments. CT also shows strong agreement with ICA in evaluating CAD. CT provides a non-invasive alternative to TEE and ICA to accurately identify MV pathology and exclude significant CAD.
Heric et al. (Thu,) conducted a cohort in Mitral valve regurgitation (n=391). ECG-gated computed tomography (CT) vs. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) was evaluated on Agreement with TEE for mitral valve prolapse (Sensitivity 96.5%, 95% CI 92.5-98.7, p=0.239). ECG-gated computed tomography demonstrated 96.5% sensitivity for diagnosing mitral valve prolapse compared to TEE and 97.9% specificity for excluding obstructive CAD compared to ICA.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: