This paper examines the relation between Gandhian nationalism and tribal communities in Maharashtra through the analytical framework of Gramsci’s Hegemony. The study argued that Gandhian leadership functioned as a form of ideological hegemony grounded in consent rather than force. Drawing the Antonio Gramsci’s ideas – such as Satyagraha, Constructive programme, use of Khadi- Self-reliance, liquor prohibition and civil disobedience, non-cooperation – were communicated and adapted Gandhian ideals within tribal regions of Maharashtra. Using district wise evidence from the Civil Disobedience Movement, Particularly from tribal concentration areas such as West Khandesh, East Khandesh, Nashik, Nanded, Palghar and Chandrapur. The study highlights the role of local leaders and volunteers as intermediaries in spreading Gandhian ideology. It indicate that tribal participation was fostered through ethical persuasion and voluntary discipline rather than polical compulsion or force. Activities such as village meetings, liquor picketing, and khadi promotion contributed to reshaping everyday social behavior. The further argues that tribal engagement with Gandhian nationalism was not mere passive but active through adaptation. Through the application of Hegemony as a historical tool, this study offers a nuanced understanding of Nationalist movement in Maharashtra and highlights tribal communities as active agent in the making of the Indian national movement.
Valvi et al. (Fri,) studied this question.