This article formalizes a three-dimensional proposal for Social Work grounded in the Cognosystemic Theory of Human Psychosocial Relational Construction (TCCR). The proposal organizes, as a logical continuum, three dimensions that in Social Work tend to be addressed implicitly or without a unified systematic articulation: (a) ontology, (b) epistemology, and (c) methodology. Accordingly, the article concretizes the TCCR proposal at the disciplinary level through: (1) a narrative-relational/ecosystemic ontology that delimits the object as psychosocial narrative-relational structuring (bond–meaning–context); (2) a cognosystemic epistemology that integrates meaning-making and relational organization, establishing internal criteria of validity—coherence, interpretive traceability, contrast with case evidence, and reflexivity; and (3) an ecosystemic–narrative methodology whose implementation is organized through an A–B–C methodics (cognosystemic delimitation, hypothesis of change and design, implementation with monitoring and evaluation), oriented toward translating analysis into evaluable intervention. Methodologically, the study develops a theoretical–conceptual analytical reconstruction based on the three-dimensional proposal and the general theoretical framework of the TCCR, in dialogue with contributions from social constructionism, the ecosystemic approach, and language analysis. The results establish canonical definitions (Cognosystem and Cognosystemic Narrative Systems as the unit of reference), an ontology → epistemology → methodology correspondence matrix, and scientific safeguards intended to prevent totalizations, epistemic ambiguities, and non-operational metaphors. The article concludes with an agenda for operationalization and applied research oriented toward evaluation through integrated domains and toward an intelligent standardization compatible with situated singularity.
Jalin Eliezer Simunovic Menares (Mon,) studied this question.